Note 1 - Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 | |
Notes to Financial Statements | |
Business Description and Accounting Policies [Text Block] |
Note 1.
Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: The interim consolidated financial statements of Bio-Techne Corporation and subsidiaries, (the Company) presented here have been prepared by the Company and are unaudited. They have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and with instructions to Form 10 -Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. They reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. These interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10 -K for fiscal 2016. A summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Company is detailed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10 -K for fiscal 2016. The Company follows these policies in preparation of the interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2015 -05, Customer's Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement . The standard provides guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If the arrangement does include a software license, the software license element of the arrangement should be accounted for in the same manner as the acquisition of other software licenses. We adopted this standard on July 1, 2016, applying it prospectively to all arrangements entered into or materially modified on or after July 1, 2016. Adoption of this standard did not have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial position.In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015 -16, Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments. When recording the purchase price allocation for a business combination in the financial statements, an acquirer may record preliminary amounts when measurements are incomplete as of the end of a reporting period. When the required information is received to finalize the purchase price allocation, the preliminary amounts are adjusted. These adjustments are referred to as measurement-period adjustments. This standard eliminates the requirement to restate prior period financial statements for measurement-period adjustments. Instead, it requires that the cumulative impact of a measurement-period adjustment be recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustment is identified. We adopted this standard on July 1, 2016, applying it prospectively. Application of this standard did not have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial position.In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016 -15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments . The standard is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. We elected to early adopt this standard as of July 1, 2016. As our consolidated statement of cash flows presentation was in compliance with the new guidance, adoption of this standard had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017 -04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment . The standard removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a company to perform procedures to determine the fair value of a reporting unit's assets and liabilities following the procedure that would be required in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Instead, a goodwill impairment charge will now be measured as the amount by which a reporting unit's carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill.We elected to early adopt this standard on
January 1, 2017. As we have not been required to complete Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, we do not anticipate that this standard will have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.Pronouncements Issued But Not Yet Adopted In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014 -09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers . The standard provides revenue recognition guidance for any entity that enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of non-financial assets, unless those contracts are within the scope of other accounting standards. The standard also expands the required financial statement disclosures regarding revenue recognition. The new guidance is effective for us on July 1, 2018. In addition, in March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016 -08, Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) , in April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016 -10, Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, and in May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016 -12, Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients . These standards are intended to clarify aspects of ASU No. 2014 -09 and are effective for us upon adoption of ASU No. 2014 -09. We are currently assessing the impact of these standards on our consolidated financial statements, as well as the method of transition that we will use in adopting the new guidance.In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015 -11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory . This provision would require inventory that was previously recorded using first -in, first -out (“FIFO”) to be recorded at lower of cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those years, which for us will be July 1, 2017. The amendments in this guidance should be applied prospectively with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual period. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2015 -11 and whether it would have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016 -01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities . The standard is intended to improve the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. This ASU is effective using the modified retrospective approach for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, which for us is July 1, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the application of this standard to have a significant impact on our result of operations or financial position.In February, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016 -02, Leases (Topic ), which amends the existing guidance to require lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities from operating leases on the balance sheet. This ASU is effective using the modified retrospective approach for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after 842
December 15, 2018, which for us is July 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016 -02 on our consolidated financial statements.In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016 -09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting . This update includes provisions intended to simplify various aspects related to how share-based payments are accounted for and presented in the financial statements. This ASU is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, which for us is July 1, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016 -09 on our consolidated financial statements.In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016 -13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic . The amendments in this update replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses. This update is intended to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses. This ASU is effective for annual periods and interim periods for those annual periods beginning after 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments December 15, 2019, which for us is July 1, 2019. Entities may early adopt beginning after December 15, 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016 -13 on our consolidated financial statements.In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017 -01, Clarifying the Definition of a Business . The standard revises the definition of a business, which affects many areas of accounting such as business combinations and disposals and goodwill impairment. The revised definition of a business will likely result in more acquisitions being accounted for as asset acquisitions, as opposed to business combinations. This ASU is effective for annual periods and interim periods for those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, which for us is July 1, 2019 required to be applied prospectively to transactions occurring on or after the effective date. |